Determinants of non-performing loan of microfinance institutions: The case of lower-middle-income countries.

Nguyen Ngoc Tan1, Nguyen Tran Xuan Linh2, Nguyen Son Hai3, Huynh Thi Tuyet Ngan4
1 People’s Committee of Ho Chi Minh City
2 Ho Chi Minh City Industry and Trade College
3 Namviet Investment - Construction and Development Joint Stock Company
4 Vietnam Maritime Commercial Joint Stock Bank

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study is conducted to assess the impact of several factors on the Non-performing Loan of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in 26 low middle-income countries in 2014-2017. The research results show that the size of MFIs, the number of borrowers, total assets and the ratio of debt to equity harm the credit risk control of MFIs. In contrast, Female borrowers, borrowers in rural areas and the number of branches have a positive impact on reducing NPLs of MFIs. This implies that specialized agencies in these countries should strengthen the supervision of MFIs with low equity capital to ensure the stable and sustainable operation of the microfinance system. Besides, MFIs should consider promoting lending to female groups, which benefits MFIs and has a positive social impact, as it helps women have opportunities to enhance their role in society.

Article Details

References

Aggarwal, R. K., Jacques, K. (1998). Assessing the impact of prompt corrective action on bank capital and risk, Economic Policy Review 4(3), 23–32.
Aghion. D. A., B. Morduch, J. (2000). Microfinance beyond group lending, Economics of Transition, 8(2), 401-420.
Anginer, D., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Zhu, M (2014). How does bank competition affect systemic stability? Journal of Financial Intermediation 23(1), 1–26.
Atkinson, A., F. Messy (2013). Promoting Financial Inclusion through Financial Education: OECD/INFE Evidence, Policies and Practice. (OECD Working Papers No. 34). Available via http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3xz6m88smp-en
Ayayi, A.G. (2012). Credit risk assessment in the microfinance industry, Economics of Transition, 20(1), 37-72.
Bhatt, N., Tang, Shui–Yan (2002). Determinants of Repayment in Microcredit: Evidence from Programs in the United States, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), 360-376.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability, Journal of Banking & Finance 37(2), 433–447.
Berger, A. N., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks, Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(6), 849–870.
Crabb, P.R., Keller, T. (2006), A test of portfolio risk in microfinance institutions, Faith and Economics, 47/48, 25-39. http://christianeconomists.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2006-Spring_Fall-Crabb_Keller.pdf
Editz, T., Michael, I., Perraudin, W. (1998). The impact of capital requirements on U.K. bank behaviour, Reserve Bank of New York Policy Review, 4 (3), 15–22.
Jacques, K., Nigro, P. (1997). Risk-based capital, portfolio risk, and bank capital: A simultaneous equations approach, Journal of Economics and Business, 49(6), 533-547.
Hartungi, R. (2007). Understanding the success factors of micro-finance institution in a developing country, International Journal of Social Economics 34, 388-401.
Keeton, W. R., Morris, C. (1987). Why Do Banks’ Loan Losses Differ? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 72(5), 3–21.
Louzis, D., Vouldis, A., Metaxas, V. (2010). Macroeconomic andbank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mort-gage, business and consumer loan portfolios. Journal Banking and Finance, 36(4), 1012–1027.
Matthews, K., J. Thompson (2008). The Economics of Banking. Chichester: Wiley.
Morduch, J. (1999). The promise of microfinance, Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4),1569-1614.
Narwal, K. P. (2014). Impact of Characteristics on Outreach and Profitability of Microfinance Institutions in India, International Journal of Financial Management 4(3), 50-57.
Nguyễn Kim Anh và Lê Thanh Tâm (2013). Mức độ bền vững của các tổ chức tài chính vi mô Việt Nam: Thực trạng và một số khuyến nghị. Nhà xuất bản Giao thông Vận Tải.
Nguyen, Hung T., Nguyen Ngoc Thach (2018). A Panorama of Applied Mathematical Problems in Economics. Thai Journal of Mathematics 17(1), 1-20.
Okumadewa, F. (1999). International agencies response to poverty situation in Nigeria. Central Bank of Nigeria Bullion, 23(4), 66-70.
Osborn, D., Cutter, A., Ullah, F (2015). Universal sustainable development goals - Understanding the transformational challenge for developed countries. Report of a study by stakeholder forum. Available at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1684SF_-_SDG_Universality_Report_-_May_2015.pdf
Quayes, S. (2015). Outreach and performance of microfinance instituitions: A panel analysis. Applied Economics, 47(18), 1909-1925.
Robinson, M. S. (2001). The Microfinance Revolution Sustainable Finance for the Poor. World bank Book.
Saravia-Matus, S., & Saravia-Matus, J. (2012). Gender Issues in Microfinance and Repayment Performance: The Case of a Nicaraguan Microfinance Institution. Encuentro, (91), 7-31.
Stolz, S., Wedow, M. (2011). Banks’ regulatory capital buffer and the business cycle: Evidence for Germany. Journal of Financial Stability,7(2), 98–110.
Thach, Nguyen Ngoc (2020). How to Explain when the ES is Lower than One? A Bayesian Nonlinear Mixed-effects Approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 13(2), 1-17.
Wagner, C., Winkler, A. (2013). The vulnerability of microfinance to financial turmoil – evidence from the global financial crisis, World Development, 51(11), 71-90.