Article Sidebar

Tải bài báo PDF (Tiếng Việt)
Published: 2022-06-25
Abstract Views: 2540
Views Tải bài báo PDF (Tiếng Việt): 1809
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52932/jfm.vi69.250
Issue
No. 69 (2022)
Section
Research Articles
How to Cite
Gấm, Đinh T. H. . (2022). Factors affecting student satisfaction with online learning during the covid-19 epidemic: The case of Can Tho University students. Journal of Finance and Marketing, 13(3), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.52932/jfm.vi69.250

Factors affecting student satisfaction with online learning during the covid-19 epidemic: The case of Can Tho University students

Dinh Thi Hong Gam1
1 Can Tho University

Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective of the study is to analyze the factors affecting the satisfaction of students at Can Tho University with the online learning method during the Covid-19 pandemic. Data for analysis were collected from 185 full-time students of Can Tho University who had access to online learning during the anti-epidemic period 6 proposed factors affecting students’ satisfaction: The course structure, lecturer-student interaction, student-student interaction, lecturer, students’ characteristics, and teaching technologies. The results show that there are four factors that have positive impacts on students’ satisfaction: the course structure, student-student interaction, lecturers, and teaching technologies. Concurrently, the study proposes some solutions to improve student satisfaction during the online learning period in the coming time.

Article Details

Keywords

Covid-19 pandemic, Online learning, Synchronous online learning, Students’ satisfaction

References

Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 118-134.
Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292.
Basuony, M. A., EmadEldeen, R., Farghaly, M., El-Bassiouny, N., & Mohamed, E. K. (2020). The factors affecting student satisfaction with online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study of an emerging Muslim country. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(3), 631-648.
Bolliger, D. U. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-learning, 3(1), 61-67.
Chen, T., Peng, L., Yin, X., Rong, J., Yang, J., & Cong, G. (2020, September). Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Healthcare Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 8(3), 200-226. DOI:10.3390/healthcare8030200
Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A threeyear study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 112-131
Dung, D. T. H. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 45-48.
Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185-215.
Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 98-119.
Hoàng Trọng và Chu Nguyễn Mộng Ngọc (2008). Phân Tích Dữ Liệu Nghiên Cứu Với SPSS. Nhà xuất bản Hồng Đức, TP. Hồ Chí Minh.
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Moore, MG (1991). Distance education theory. The American Journal of Distance Learning, 5, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649109526758
Ngo, J., & Ngadiman, A. (2021). Investigating Student Satisfaction in Remote Online Learning Settings During Covid-19 in Indonesia. Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 10(2), 73-95.
Nguyễn Thị Lệ (2012). Nghiên cứu về E-learning và đề xuất giải pháp triển khai E-learning trong trường phổ thông. Luận văn Thạc sĩ, Học viện Công nghệ Bưu chính viễn thông.
Phan Thị Ngọc Thanh, Nguyễn Ngọc Thông, và Nguyễn Thị Phương Thảo (2020). Cảm nhận của sinh viên chính quy khi trải nghiệm học trực tuyến hoàn toàn trong thời gian phòng chống dịch Covid-19. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 15(4), 18-28
Sharma, K., Deo, G., Timalsina, S., Joshi, A., Shrestha, N., & Neupane, H. C. (2020). Online learning in the face of COVID-19 pandemic: Assessment of students’ satisfaction at Chitwan medical college of Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 18(2), 40-47.
Thach, P., Lai, P., Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Online learning amid Covid-19 pandemic: students' experience and satisfaction. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 17(1), 39-48.
Tsang, J. T., So, M. K., Chong, A. C., Lam, B. S., & Chu, A. M. (2021). Higher Education during the Pandemic: The Predictive Factors of Learning Effectiveness in COVID-19 Online Learning. Education Sciences, 11(8), 446.
Yulia, H. (2020). Online learning to prevent the spread of pandemic corona virus in Indonesia. Eternal (English Teaching Journal), 11(1), 48-56.